It’s hard to remember how hard it was to look for work—or leave your current job—before technology changed everything.

Consider what LinkedIn does for you. It allows you to have your own identity apart from your current employer, as if you own your labor. You gather your own network and keep it as you move from job to job.

You can job hunt without seeming to betray your boss. You can be available for job offers, too, even if you don’t think of yourself as being on the market. When you change jobs, you can add that to your profile with a few clicks and have that change announced to your network. Otherwise, everything is the same. You are faced with a daily variety of choice among employers competing to hire you for your skills. Or you can very easily go solo, choosing to gig and contract as your own personal business.

This is emancipation. This gives you freedom of choice.

Maybe that doesn’t impress you too much. We take it all for granted. But actually social media platforms have changed everything about the right to work. Before the internet, you did not have the ability to make a public profile page that people could follow, and moving jobs was fraught with risk. You had to send in your resume, but you could not use your current employer as a reference or let your coworkers know you were in the market. You were stuck looking through help-wanted ads or getting news of open offers from a word-of-mouth network.

It was hard to make or take calls about possible new positions from the office because you didn’t have a cell phone. You had to scramble on nights and weekends. You dressed for a job interview—everything depended on the interview because there was no way for people to post testimonials about you—and everyone at the office would get suspicious. When you left your job, or got fired, much of the intangible knowledge and network capital you developed in your last job you had to forgo. You had to start over entirely. The prospect alone was enough to discourage you from even looking for a new position.

Technological limitations and government interventions hobbled labor market adjustments. It could not clear as a market should.

Then Came the Internet

When we think of internet commerce, we think of eBay or Amazon, or perhaps Craigslist, but it is the job marketplace that has made the massive difference in our lives. Anyone can recommend you for a position by sharing a link to your professional profile. You can stay on the market at all times, posting on your profile without raising suspicions or being seen as a betrayer. Your resume is before the world at all times. If disaster should strike after a fallout with the boss, you have a network to tap instantly to provide a bridge to the future.

And it’s not just you. Every participant in the global market can upload a work history and resume, catalog skills, gather endorsements, post personal testimonies, and so on. What it means is truly striking. LinkedIn, then, takes that crucial step toward a real market for labor by setting information free. Then add to that the remarkable power of ride sharing, task rabbiting, remote working, digital nomadism, and gigging in general.

The information economy has liberated those who do the work from servile dependency on any single capital-controlling employer. We didn’t need Karl Marx to invent a new political order to do that; we just needed a better software infrastructure.

As I’ve pointed out, one of the terrible consequences of government intervention in the workplace is how it has chained workers to their jobs. The American corporate structure after World War II was modeled on the European welfare state except with the benefits provided privately through the companies with government subsidies. The results have been terrible for the American worker. Health care benefits, complicated tax accounting, and all sorts of mandates have caused the labor market to be far less fluid than it was a century ago.

Now, thanks to digital entrepreneurship, we are starting to see what competition for labor looks like. You can go to a site like Indeed.com and see postings for your skills right in your town or anywhere you want to move. Or you can post a job availability. Every industry has a micro version of the same. You can advertise too.

The contribution this makes toward better placement is incalculable. It might be one of the factors driving the low unemployment numbers, though I’ve never seen anyone give software the credit.

What Determines Wages

It should be obvious that market competition is good for workers because it clarifies their value to employers and enables them to charge the right price for their work. In economic theory, over the long term, in a free market, workers earn what they contribute to the profitability of the firm (a theory that comes from Knut Wicksell).

In real market conditions, however, what determines the wage is more immediately influenced by the worker’s next-best wage option in the market. You are paid enough to keep you there because the pay is better than you can get elsewhere. But that supposes you are always on the market as a worker. The more you know about your market worth, the better off you are.

I wrote economist Alexander Tabarrok about this aspect of wage determination. My question: In economic theory, wages equal marginal product, but in practice, it seems like the wage is determined more by the opportunity cost of the current job. His answer is brilliant:

“I don’t think your thinking is wrong, it’s more like this is the process by which the economic theory turns out to be approximately true. Consider the following. In economics we teach that profits tend toward zero (normal). If you talk to a business person, however, they will say, ‘What are you talking about? What I am always thinking about is maximizing my profits, getting them bigger, that’s what a successful business person does!’ Quite so, but the net result of everyone trying to increase profits is that profits are driven down!

“In the case of wages, I agree that the simple model that we teach doesn’t really fit the facts that well. In the simple model, it’s often identical workers producing identical products and there is one wage given by the market for all the workers and the manager hires until the point where wages equal the marginal product. In the more common situation, the workers are all different, the employer isn’t hiring more than one for the same position and the wage is negotiated not given.

“Still, each employer has to evaluate the worker and the job and each employer has to say do I want the worker or not and over time workers with wages greater than marginal product get let go and everyone wants to hire when wages are smaller than the marginal product so wages get pushed up.

“But it’s a messy process. Not as clean as in the model. And also the perspective of the employer is not the perspective of the economist. We might say wages equal the marginal product is more a product of human action than human design! FYI, note that this also means there is more room for discrimination, for example, than in the simple model.”

What this “messy process” means in practice is that you have to differentiate yourself, offering labor as a unique individual rather than as part of a labor pool. To do that, in a world in which millions are competing for your job, you need a tool. The digital world has provided us with just that. It is wonderful and brilliant, and ever more valuable in a tight labor market such as we have now.

All of which is to say, if you have not beefed up your online profile as a worker, or consider leaving the grind of a corporate job for a market-based gig, today might be the time to get to work on it. The market is doing everything possible to enhance your dignity as a worker and make it possible for you to earn your economic worth.

Here again, software (not ideology, not politics) has proven to be the friend of the worker, making dreams come true that would not have been possible in ages past.

Jeffrey Tucker is editorial director for the American Institute for Economic Research. He is the author of five books, including “Right-Wing Collectivism: The Other Threat to Liberty.” This article was first published on AIER.org

Share
Tag: Categories: News Opinion

Video Popular

  • Celebrating Arbor Day With Books

    Celebrating Arbor Day With Books

    Trees were once considered sacred and awe-inspiring: Oaks were worshiped by the European Druids, redwoods were a part of American Indian ritual, and baobabs a part of African tribal life. Ancient Chin ...

  • Sharks Eat Their Greens, Too—First Omnivorous Species Confirmed

    Sharks Eat Their Greens, Too—First Omnivorous Species Confirmed

    Not all sharks feed only on meat—at least one shark species also feeds on seagrass. Scientists have confirmed that one of the most common sharks in the world is an omnivore. The bonnethead shark, a re ...

  • Microsoft Flags Dangers to EU of Plans to Limit Data Use

    Microsoft Flags Dangers to EU of Plans to Limit Data Use

    Microsoft said on Sept. 5, that EU lawmakers’ copyright reforms limiting the use of potentially valuable data to non-profit bodies could damage the European Union’s digital development. Co ...

  • How Setting a Schedule Can Make You Less Productive

    How Setting a Schedule Can Make You Less Productive

    It can seem like there’s never enough time—not enough for sleep and not enough for play, not enough for cooking. and not enough for exercise. There’s a relatively new term to describe this feeling: ti ...

  • RiNo, Denver: America’s Best Place for a Bar Crawl?

    RiNo, Denver: America’s Best Place for a Bar Crawl?

    “RiNo reminds me of Williamsburg in 2004—just pretentious enough to be good, not yet pretentious enough to be annoying.” Kevin Burke is joking, of course. As the general manager of American Bonded—one ...

  • Respecting Teachers and Cherishing Virtue

    Respecting Teachers and Cherishing Virtue

    Respecting teachers and cherishing virtues are part of the traditional ethics practiced by the Chinese people. Teachers, who impart morality, knowledge, and values, teach people the proper ways to int ...

  • Home Ownership in Canada Declines, Reversing Long Upward Trend

    Home Ownership in Canada Declines, Reversing Long Upward Trend

    Home ownership in Canada fell for the first time in over 45 years, according to a Point2Homes study released this week. It had reached a record high of 69 percent in 2011, but as of 2016, it fell to 6 ...

  • Aretha Franklin Dresses, Hats to Go up for Auction

    Aretha Franklin Dresses, Hats to Go up for Auction

    NEW YORK—More than 30 dresses and accessories worn on stage by Aretha Franklin are going up for auction. The Queen of Soul died at age 76 in Detroit on Aug. 16. Julien’s Auctions says the items ...

  • 87 Elephants Found Slaughtered in Botswana, Africa

    87 Elephants Found Slaughtered in Botswana, Africa

    An alarming number of elephant carcasses have been discovered in aerial surveys across Botswana in what has been described as a “poaching frenzy.” Botswana was once known as a sanctuary fo ...

  • Yes, Marijuana Can Be Addictive

    Yes, Marijuana Can Be Addictive

    The business world is salivating at the potential $22.6 billion recreational marijuana market in Canada, with more new pot users expected after legalization on Oct. 17. But public-health officials wan ...

  • Google Races to Parry the Rise of Facebook in India

    Google Races to Parry the Rise of Facebook in India

    Google retains only a slight lead over Facebook in the competition for digital ad dollars in the crucial India market, sources familiar with the figures say, even though the search giant has been in t ...

  • Canada in Brief, Sept. 6-12

    Canada in Brief, Sept. 6-12

    Trudeau says he won’t use ‘tricks’ to ram through pipeline construction Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is pouring cold water on Alberta’s suggestion that the federal government use legislation or a cou ...